Hi,
[Calculated fields] Analysis vs Data Prep
at which stage do you recommend inserting Calculated fields ?
in other words, what are the benefits of each level?
kind regards,
Hi @chhbi
Here is a high-level comparison of using calculated fields at the analysis level vs data prep level in Amazon Quick Sight:
| Calculated Fields | Analysis Level | Data Prep Level |
|---|---|---|
| Use Cases | Tailored to specific analysis/visual | Reusable across analyses |
| Flexibility | Can change often during exploration | Governed transformations |
| Data Scope | Compute on aggregated data | Affect raw dataset |
| Field References | Can leverage other analysis fields | Referenced in analysis calculated fields |
| Performance | Interactive analytical workflow | Efficient for large data |
| Workflow Stage | Ad hoc analytics | Early data preparation |
| Nested Calculations | Simpler calculations | More complex |
In summary:
-
Analysis level calculated fields enable flexible analytics tailored to the needs of a given analysis.
-
Data prep calculated fields allow governed transformations reusable across analyses for efficiency.
-
Using calculated fields at both levels together provides benefits across the analytics workflow.
Hope it helps,
GL
Hi,
Very much so.
Thank you for your clear and prompt response
kind regards