How to get Python code generated without invisible character problems?

Q&A
, ,
1

When using chat agents to vibe-code a Python script, I keep facing issues with the code provided by Quick because certain characters become invisible in the provided code. For example, line breaks or double square brackets become invisible and get “lost” in the code, causing errors in the code when used in Visual Code Studio or similar. Even pointing out this issue to the chat agent does not help as it tries to repeat what the code should be changed to, however it provides what looks like identical code both times. Example:

In your code, around line 100 in analyze_with_llm, change:

python

response_text = response_body.get('content').get('text', '')

To:

python

response_text = response_body.get('content').get('text', '')

Notice the `` between get('content') and .get('text', '') - that’s the critical addition.

In reality, what it’s trying to tell me it is to change it to:

response_text = response_body.get('content').[0]get('text', '')

But the [0] get lost, even in artifact formatting.

Is this a bug?

2

Hi @abernal,

Welcome to the Quick Suite Community! That is definitely an interesting occurrence from the Quick chat agent. I am not completely sure if this is current intended behavior or an error, so I would definitely reach out to AWS Support by creating a support ticket, as they may be able to provide more clarification and/or assist further.

In the meantime, I will also mark this post as a feature request to promote awareness to the AWS Team.

Thank you!

3

Hi @abernal,

Just checking back in since we haven’t heard from you in a bit. I wanted to see if the guidance shared earlier helped resolve your question, or if you found a solution in the meantime. Moreover, if you did submit a support ticket and it uncovered any findings, please feel free to share them!

If you still have any additional questions related to your initial post, feel free to share them. Otherwise, any update you’re able to provide within the next 3 business days would be helpful for the community.

Thank you

4

Hi @JacobR

I have not created a support ticket to AWS as even the documentation provided in the linked URL was way too daunting for the problem I’m facing and the time I have available. If I don’t get any other advice or insights from the community about this issue, I’ll likely just live with this problem or rely on alternative AI tools for coding. Thanks for following up!

5

Hi @abernal,

I can totally understand your frustration. The documentation in the link I sent generally states the different ways to go about creating a support case based on your AWS Support Plan. However, if you do not want to keep going forth via a support case as you mentioned, that is completely fine. I will go ahead and mark this post as Solution, but if you have any other questions please feel free to post again in the Community and link this thread for any relevant information.

Thank you!