Cascading filters change

[yaomeng]

The data structure is shown in the figure above.

This is a Cascading filter，I think when all three of filters indicate ‘select all’,
Change the second filter selection value，Can the first filter represent the corresponding value at this point.
For example, I am currently selecting ‘B-1’，Can the first filter directly represent ‘B’?

Of course, the prerequisite for implementing this function is not to change the previous cascade function.
Can this be achieved?

[Max]

Hi @yaomeng

You cannot alter a different parameter from another parameter.

This will need to be marked as a feature request.

[yaomeng]

Hi @Max
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.